|
This
research essay will be graded at several different stages. The preliminary
sub-tasks will be evaluated, the research paper will be evaluated, the Works
Cited will be evaluated, and finally, the organization will be evaluated.
With at least four major
grades and several minor grades associated with this project,
please take the time to go the writing process and choose carefully how you
will, as Judge Mathis says, "Prove your case."
Turning it in:
Process Parts
Romanticism Literary Research Paper
Project
Name_____________________Class_________ Date________
Staple in
the following order and check off (if you included it). Then
turn it in at the start of the period.
On top:
Points possible:
 | This
paper
______ (10) |
 | Rough draft(s) of intro paragraph (with my comments +3
bonus) ______ (10)
|
 | Rough drafts of body paragraphs (with my comments +5 bonus)
______ (30) |
 | Rough drafts of Works Cited (with my comments +2 bonus
) ______ ( 20) |
 | All other materials (brainstorming boxes, movie
questions, ______ (10) |
peer reviews, works cited
source data, etc.)
 | Zerox/print of quote from other source, highlighted.
______ ( 20)
|
Total:

Evaluation of Final draft
6 + 1 Traits (Look at the criteria
for ideas, organization, and conventions.)
WOW!
Name________________
Exceeds
expectations
5
_
STRONG:
Class________________
shows control
and skill in this trait;
many strengths
present
1. Ideas________________
_
EFFECTIVE:
on balance, the
strengths outweigh the
2.
Organization__________
weaknesses; a
small amount of
revision is
needed
3. Conventions___________
3
_
DEVELOPING:
strengths and
need for revision are
4.
Research components______
about equal;
about half-way home
-- Citations, Works Cited, correct MLA format--
_
EMERGING:
need for
revision outweighs strengths; 5.
Quotes____________
isolated
moments hint at what the
--All six quotes, blended, introduced, logical--
writer has in
mind
1
_
NOT YET:
Early/ OT/ Late
Bonus
a bare
beginning; writer not yet
showing any
control
|

IDEAS
5
A.
The topic is
narrow
and
manageable. B.
Relevant, telling, quality details beyond the
predictable.
C.
Reasonably
accurate details
are present to support
the main ideas.
D. writing
from
knowledge or
experience;
the ideas
are freshand
original. E.
questions
are
anticipated and answered.
3
A.
The
topic is fairly broad;
however, you can see where the writer is headed.
B. Support is attempted,
but doesn't go far enough
C. Ideas are reasonably
clear,
though they may not be detailed, personalized, accurate, or expanded
enough to show in depth understanding or a strong sense of purpose.
D.
The writer
has difficulty going
from general observations to specifics.
E.
The reader is
left with
questions
F.
The
writer generally stays
on the topic
but does not develop a
clear theme. The writer has not yet focused the topic past the obvious.
1
A.
The writer
is still in
search of a topic,
brainstorming, or has not yet decided what the main idea of the piece will
be. B.
Information is
limited
or
unclear
or the
length is not adequate
C.
The idea is
a simple
restatement
of the topic or an
answer
to the question with
little or no attention to detail.
D.
The writer has
not begun to define
the topic in
a meaningful, personal way.
E. Everything seems as
important as everything else;
the reader has a hard time sifting out what is important.
F.
The text may be
repetitious,
or may read like a collection of
disconnected, random
thoughts
with no discernable point.
ORGANIZATION
5
A.
An
inviting introduction
draws the
reader in; a
satisfying conclusion
leaves the reader with
a sense of closure and resolution.
B. Thoughtful
transitions
clearly show how ideas connect.
C. sequencing is
logical and
effective.
D. Pacing is
well controlled.E
Organization
flows so
smoothly the
reader hardly thinks about it
3
A.
recognizable
introduction and conclusion.
The introduction may not create a strong sense of anticipation; the
conclusion may not tie-up all loose ends.
B. Transitions often
work well;
at other times, connections between ideas are fuzzy.
C. Sequencing
shows
some logic,
but not under control enough that it consistently supports the ideas. In
fact, sometimes it is so predictable and rehearsed that the
structure takes
attention away from the content. D. Pacing is fairly well controlled,
though the
writer sometimes lunges ahead too quickly or spends too much time on
details that do not matter.
E.
The
organization sometimes
supports the main point or storyline;
at other times ,the
reader feels an urge to slip in a transition or move things around.
1 A.
There is
no real lead
to set-up what
follows, no
real conclusion
to wrap things up.
B.
Connections between
ideas are
confusing or
not even present.
C. Sequencing needs
lots and
lots of work.
D. Pacing feels awkward;
the writer slows to a
crawl when the reader wants to get on with it, and vice versa.
E.
Problems with
organization make it
hard for the reader to
get a grip
on the main point or story line.
CONVENTIONS
"How much work would a
copy editor need to do to prepare the piece for publication?"
5
A. Spelling
is generally correct.
B.
The
punctuation is accurate
C. capitalization
skills are present.
D. Grammar
and usage are correct E. Paragraphing tends to be sound F. ready to
publish.
3
A. Spelling
is usually
correct B. End punctuation is usually correct;
internal punctuation
(commas, apostrophes,
semicolons, dashes, colons, parentheses)
is sometimes
missing/wrong.
C. Most words are
capitalized correctly
D. Problems
with grammar or usage are not serious
enough to distort
meaning E.
Paragraphing is attempted
but may run together or
begin in the wrong places .F.
Moderate editing
(a little of this, a
little of that) would be required to polish the text for publication.
1
A. Spelling errors are frequent,
even on common words.
B. Punctuation
(including terminal
punctuation) is often
missing or incorrect.
C.
Capitalization
is
random
and only the easiest
rules show awareness of correct use.
D. Errors in grammar or
usage or MLA citation are very noticeable,
frequent, and affect
meaning/accuracy.
E. Paragraphing is
missing, irregular, or so frequent
(every sentence) that
it has no relationship to the organizational structure of the text.
F. The
reader must
read once to decode,
then again for meaning.
Extensive editing
(virtually every line) would b
e required to polish the text for
publication.
|
|
Beginning
|
Developing
|
Accomplished
|
Exemplary |
Score |
|
Quoting
sources
(Ideas, Conventions) |
Incomplete/Incorrect sub-tasks
missing two or more of the following:
a. 4 quotes from movie
script
b. 1 quote from literature
text
c. 1 quote from other
academic source
Quotes just stuck in the paragraphs without
being introduced
incorrect citation for more than two of the
quotes
|
Missing one of the quotes
Quotes just stuck in the paragraphs without
being introduced
incorrect citation for more than two of the
quotes
quotes do not seem logically related to
paragraph
|
All six quotes there
The writer used the heart of the quote
Quotes are "blended" into the text, not
isolated
mostly correct citation
Quotes are pertinent and are the basis of good
commentary
Used feedback to improve essay |
All six quotes there
The writer used the heart of the quote
Quotes are "blended" into the text, not
isolated
correct citation
Insightful analysis
Innovative ideas
Fixed errors |
|
|
Research
Paper
(Ideas,Word Choice, Presentation) |
Little/ineffective apparent
analysis or effort
Shorter than three body
paragraphs, intro/conclusion confusing, not clear
Not on time |
Some
apparent analysis or effort
Adequate length
Ineffective/illogical quoting
commentary after quote missing or ineffective
intro or conclusion perfunctory/not effective
Late |
Adequate length
Good quoting/research
Creative thoughts
Good quotes, but student's own commentary is
missing after quotes, making reader have to infer the connection/point
intro or conclusion mostly effective
On time |
Adequate length
Good research
Significant quotes add strength to topic
Insightful commentary/ analysis using quotes
Innovative ideas
Effective/powerful
introduction/conclusion
|
|
|
Works
Cited
(Conventions, Presentation) |
Incomplete--Missing one source or parts within
several sources
Late
Not typed |
Missing parts within one source
Small glitches throughout
not alphabetized
Spacing incorrect
|
Correct MLA format
All parts there
Small glitches
|
Correct MLA format
Impressive Sources
Exemplary format
Neat |
|
|
Organization
(Organization) |
Incomplete
unclear or no thesis statement
Some transitions missing or not so effective,
not smooth |
Attempt at introduction strategy
Mostly well-organized
Some transitions missing or not so effective,
not smooth |
clearly worded- Thesis
clearly-worded restatement
clear introduction strategy
Clearly well-organized
topic sentences, transitions where
needed, conclusion sentences
|
Powerful
Very clear
Every part in place and effective
|
|
|
Conventions |
Ten or more errors in
MLA format (typing, spacing, font size, margins, Titles, header, etc.)
Lack of neatness
Poor grammar, incomplete |
Five -nine errors in
MLA format (typing, spacing, font size, margins, Titles, header, etc.)
Lack of neatness
More than five grammatical errors per page
Errors not fixed in research paper or works
cited |
Mostly correct MLA format using Noodle Tools or
MLA handbook
Small/few grammatical
errors
|
Correct MLA format
Two or less grammatical errors per page |
|